Prediction Markets and the Next Phase of Risk Transfer

By: Magnus Almqvist, CEO, Exberry Jun 2026

Prediction markets are emerging as a mechanism that could reshape how risk is distributed across financial systems. Rapid growth in participation and volume signals expanding institutional relevance alongside retail momentum.

As these venues mature, their implications extend well beyond exchange operators, raising serious questions about how event-based trading could intersect with industries such as reinsurance and broader capital allocation. For those running exchanges, understanding both the trajectory and the infrastructure it demands has become a priority.

From niche to asset class

Originating as a niche application of event contracts within regulated derivative exchanges, prediction markets are now expanding across asset classes and jurisdictions. Monthly notional trading volumes surged from under $100 million in early 2024 to over $13 billion by late 2025, reflecting a compressed growth trajectory.

Recent regulatory developments have clarified the status of these instruments within a supervised framework. Notable milestones include Kalshi's 2024 court win against the CFTC and the formal designation of Polymarket as a regulated US derivatives exchange in 2025. Ongoing state-level gaming actions in Nevada and Arizona, and federal suits involving Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois, continue to test the legal boundaries of the category.

Institutional participation is rising alongside retail demand, with capital market operators and financial institutions recognising prediction markets as a viable asset class for forecasting and risk hedging. Investment at this scale, including ICE's $2 billion commitment and the strategic partnership between CME Group and FanDuel, points to deep structural change.

Markets that never close

These venues never stop. Trading activity is tied directly to real-world events, with platforms setting a precedent for near-continuous activity and establishing expectations for responsiveness and liquidity provision around the clock. Retail accessibility, including low entry thresholds, has broadened the participant base, while institutional capital is reinforcing depth and stability. This convergence is reshaping how exchanges think about market design and trading cycles, with knock-on effects for engagement.

A bridge to reinsurance

Event contracts linked to weather, geopolitical outcomes, or macroeconomic developments resemble insurance-type exposures in structure and intent. That creates a pathway for reinsurance participants, who manage risk in opaque, over-the-counter markets, to engage with more transparent, exchange-based environments and broaden their exposure. Institutional investors such as pension funds are also seeking diversified exposure to event-driven risk profiles.

Reinsurance firms gain a route to hedge liabilities such as extreme weather events and cyber threats, while capital markets participants gain an avenue to allocate funds to those risks through structured contracts. The result is an emerging bridge between capital markets and reinsurance, with prediction markets acting as a connecting layer that distributes risk across a broader investor base. This matters because costs in reinsurance markets continue to climb, placing real strain on traditional capacity at exactly the point where fresh institutional money could meet it.

Regulation and integrity

The pace of expansion has intensified regulatory scrutiny, particularly at the intersection of derivatives regulation and gaming law. Jurisdictional disputes and legal challenges highlight the complexity of defining event contracts within existing frameworks.

Market integrity is an equally pressing concern. Risks include trading on material non-public information, alongside the need for enforceable governance standards. Institutional adoption ultimately depends on transparent, auditable operational models that earn regulatory confidence. Without that foundation, broader adoption stalls.

Built for continuous markets

The evolution of prediction markets places significant demands on underlying infrastructure as trading becomes continuous and event-driven. Auditability requires deterministic event logging and full lifecycle traceability from order entry through to settlement. Open standards and API connectivity support external validation and regulatory oversight across participants and jurisdictions.

Round-the-clock trading introduces real complexity in margining, funding, and settlement, requiring systems designed for uninterrupted operation. As prediction markets begin to intersect with reinsurance-style risk transfer, infrastructure must also support more sophisticated contract structures and richer risk-modelling inputs, alongside integration with external data sources.

Speed to market matters. Operators are seeking to deploy new venues rapidly while preserving compliance and resilience. Modern cloud-native, SaaS-delivered trading platforms are increasingly positioned to meet these demands, offering pre-built, modular architectures that support quick deployment alongside built-in auditability.

From sandbox to scale

Many participants enter this space with evolving requirements, using sandbox environments to prototype and refine their models before full deployment. Such venues support integration testing and scenario modelling, while enabling engagement with regulators through live demonstrations of market behaviour. Operators can validate design choices in a controlled setting before moving into production.

As the market matures, prediction markets are positioned as a mechanism for pricing and transferring real-world risk across a wider financial ecosystem. Their growing connection to capital markets and reinsurance opens up new opportunities for risk distribution, alongside heightened expectations around transparency and performance, with regulatory alignment as a baseline. The next phase will be defined by operators who can build at the speed of this demand while operating at institutional scale. The decisions taken now on technology and architecture will determine who gets there.

Disclaimer:

The views, thoughts and opinions contained in this Focus article belong solely to the author and do not necessarily reflect the WFE’s policy position on the issue, or the WFE’s views or opinions.